1999 Annual Report of the Section on the Sociology of Law 1. A Business Meeting was held on Monday, August 9, 1999, 11:30am at the annual meeting of the ASA in Chicago. There were 32 members present. Business discussed included: ASA Committee on Sections, search for a new newsletter editor, award of prizes, membership outreach and approval of budget Business meeting minutes submitted by Kitty Calavita, Secretary/Treasurer. Chair Susan Silbey began by explaining the role of the Committee on Sections (COS), which oversees the activities of the individual sections. She reported that the meeting of the COS included some criticism from section members regarding a relative lack of representation on the Committee on Sections. She announced that a petition is circulating, which would change the composition of the COS, to include 3 more members elected from past chairs of sections (one each from small, medium, and large sections). This petition requires 450 signatures to pass. Carol Heimer, Chair of the article prize committee, reported that there were few submissions for this prize, and the committee therefore took an active role in reviewing a wide range of articles from major journals including the Law and Society Review, the American Journal of Sociology, the American Sociological Review, and Law and Social Inquiry. Ultimately, they considered 50 articles over a two-year period. The award went to Kitty Calavita for her article, "Immigration, Law, and Marginalization in a Global Economy: Notes from Spain," in the Law and Society Review, Volume 32, 1998: 529-566. Honorable mentions went to Frank Dobbin and John R. Sutton for their article, "The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions," American Journal of Sociology, Volume 104, 1998: 441-476; and Joseph Sanders, V. Lee Hamilton, and Toshiyuki Yuasa for their article, "The Institutionalization of Sanctions for Wrongdoing Inside Organizations," Law and Society Review, Volume 32, 1998: 871-929. Chair Susan Silbey (for student prize committee Chair, John Noakes) announced that the undergraduate student prize goes to Michelle Manasha, Franklin and Marshall College, for her paper "The Organizational Process Leading to Successful Juvenile Detention Reform: Arizona Juvenile Corrections,1986-1999". The best graduate student paper prize was given to Annette Nierobisz, University of Toronto, for her paper, "Wrongful Dismissal Litigation in and Era of Economic Uncertainty: Exploring the Influence of Changing Economies in Judicial Decisions" Matt Silberman, Chair of the Publciations Committee, announced that we need to find a replacement for Bob Kidder as Newsletter editor. He described the various sections of the Newsletter--teaching, graduate student affairs, recent publications column, employment column--and the fact that we need to recruit people to the publications committee who can take responsibility for these sections. Matt is in charge of the electronic end of the Newsletter and the section home page and will continue to be responsible for these. There was some discussion of allowing the new editor to hire an assistant for approximately $300, and it was decided that we should not specify that this position necessarily go to a student--graduate or undergraduate--but that this should be up to the discretion of the new editor. Next year's program was discussed at some length. Nancy Reichman discussed tentative plans for next year's sessions, suggesting that they might include a session highlighting graduate student papers, either alone or together with a faculty member; Liz Boyle may develop a partnership with the section on comparative-historical research, and initiate some swapping of sessions with them; and, we may continue our partnership with crime, law, and deviance and develop a session on the mutual connections between criminology and the sociology of law. We were reminded that sessions for next year's meeting need to be in place by September 10. It was pointed out that since next year's meeting is in Washington, DC, the sociology of law section might play a unique role. One suggestion was for our section to sponsor a field-trip/tour of DC courts. Another possibility was to sponsor a workshop/didactic seminar on how to use legal resources in research, keeping in mind that members of many other sections do research in which legal resources might be useful. This latter event could be either free or on a fee basis, and could be either just before the meetings or as a regular panel (in addition to our regularly allotted sessions). There was also an open discussion of what kinds of topics our section should highlight at the ASA meeting in Anaheim, California, in 2001. It was suggested that, particularly given the location, we might emphasize themes related to 1) immigration law and policy (with Doug Massey as President that year, this might be developed as a plenary); 2) law and pop culture; 3) law and globalization; 4) Disneyland; 5) a joint effort with science, knowledge, and technology. In addition, we might try to develop the didactic workshop on legal resources discussed above. Secretary-Treasurer Kitty Calavita presented the budget. She pointed out that our section has developed a small reserve of $1870.01. She noted that approximately $300 of our assets this year and $300 last year were the result of an error by the ASA, thereby making the short-term increase in assets more than it otherwise would have been. There was some discussion about modest increases to our budget, in particular for the annual section reception, which we do jointly with the section on crime, law, and deviance. This year, $800 was allotted for the reception, and food ran out early. Calavita presented a draft budget for 2000 in which the reception budget would increase to $1000; $300 would go toward increasing membership; and $300 would go toward hiring an assistant for the Newsletter; an extra $50 would be put aside for possible postage increases for the Newsletter; other expenses would remain the same as for1999. Section expenses for 2000 would thus be: $1000 annual meeting reception (up from $800) $1450 Newsletter (up from $1100) $50 awards $100 postage $300 recruitment TOTAL EXPENSES: $2900 The budget was approved and the meeting was adjourned at 12:30. 2. Sociology of Law Section Council Meeting was held Monday August 9 from 10:30 - 11:30 am, at the ASA annual meeting in Chicago. Minutes of the Council meeting were reported by Kitty Calavita, Secretary Treasurer. Present: Susan Silbey, Chair Robin Stryker, Chair-elect Nancy Reichman, incoming Chair-elect Kitty Calavita, Secretary-Treasurer John Hagan, Chair, Nominations Committee Matt Silberman, Publications Committee Carol Heimer, Chair, Article Prize Committee Bryant Garth, Council member Mark Suchman, Council member Joachim Savelsberg, Council member Jerry VanHoy, Council member Wendy Espeland, Council member The meeting began at 10:30. The first order of business was a report from John Hagan and Mark Suchman on the nominations committee. They are soliciting nominations and volunteers to be considered for office in the section. Next, Carol Heimer, Chair of the article prize committee, reported that since they did not receive many nominations, they took an active role in reviewing articles from the major journals, including the Law and Society Review, the American Journal of Sociology, the American Sociological Review, and Law and Social Inquiry. Ultimately, they considered 50 articles over two years. The winner was to be announced at the general section meeting. Susan Silbey gave the student prize committee report, in the absence of committee chair, John Noakes. The committee read a number of excellent undergraduate and graduate papers, and the winners were to be announced at the general meeting. Matt Silberman discussed the need to find a new Newsletter editor for AMICI. Susan Silbey put forward the idea of paying a graduate student a small stipend for assisting a new editor with the Newsletter production. She proposed the possibility of advertising on the listserv for a new Newsletter editor, with the understanding that they would be able to hire a student (for approximately $300) to assist them. The content of the Newsletter was also discussed. Susan Silbey said that sometimes things come to the major journals that are not appropriate for publication in the journal--such as conference reports--that might go to the Newletter instead. In addition, Matt discussed the need for volunteers to serve on the publications committee. While Matt is responsible for the section web page and other electronic outlets for the section, volunteers are needed for the graduate student section of the Newsletter. Robin Stryker discussed a number of issues relating to next year's program. For the past two years, our section has coordinated with other sections (gender, organizations, etc.) and has managed to organize three sessions at the meetings, instead of our normal allotment of two. New partnerships were discussed for next year, including the possibility of coordinating with the crime, law, and deviance section; historical comparative; medicine; or, science and technology. An idea was put forward to do a graduate student session, in which the panelists are either all graduate students presenting their research, or graduate students and a faculty member. It was decided that, assuming we get 3 sessions, they might be: a graduate student session; a session in collaboration with crime, law, and deviance; and a session organized by Liz Boyle either in collaboration with the comparative historical section or on her own. The deadline for establishing sessions for next year's meeting is September 10. It was pointed out that there has been no active membership committee, and that we need to name a chair and re-establish that committee. Various methods of attracting new members were discussed. It was noted that many sections that are not explicitly law-related include significant socio-legal components, and that we might recruit for membership from some of these sections. The examples of science, knowledge and technology, and comparative historical were given. We might then target presenters who give interesting papers at these sessions for possible membership. Other areas of recruitment might be: 1) the authors of the 50 articles reviewed by the prize committee; 2) people nominated for office in the section who are not members; 3) students who were nominated for best paper prizes. Kitty Calavita presented the 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 section budget information. She noted that the section has a gradually increasing, but still small, reserve of funds. The section revenues come from three main sources: dues, ASA allotment for the section, and donations. It was noted that approximately $300 of our assets this year and $300 last year were the result of an error by the ASA, thereby making the short-term increase more than it otherwise would have been. Net assets for 1999 are $1870.01. There was some discussion about modest increases to our budget, in particular for the annual section reception. This year, $800 was allotted for the reception, and some remarked that food ran out early. Consideration was given to increasing the reception budget to $1000-1200. Our reception has been joint with the crime, law, and deviance section. Consideration was also given to enhancing the budgets of the Newsletter (to hire a student), and to the membership committee for mailings, etc. New Business: Susan Silbey discussed the increased rationalization of ASA procedures, and the need for more detailed reports from the various committees of the sections (our section tends to submit excellent reports). While the sociology of law section has 306 members (the minimum for a section of the ASA is 300), our survival is probably not in jeopardy, because the ASA uses both quantitative and qualitative criteria for evaluating the viability of sections. Nonetheless, Susan underscored the importance of continuing recruitment efforts. In addition, Chair Silbey discussed the role of the Committee on Sections (COS) of the ASA, which establishes governance policies for sections and oversees their operations. She reported that at the COS meeting, there was some discussion of further democratizing the relations between COS and the individual sections. Finally, the Chair mentioned the efforts of Austin Sarat to establish a consortium on interdisciplinary socio-legal studies, comprised of the various social science associations with socio-legal components. She will put his proposal for such a consortium in the Newsletter. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30. Respectfully submitted by: Susan S. Silbey Section Chair, Sociology of Law November 17, 1999